<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Validation is for loosers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alteredaspect.info/validation-is-for-loosers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alteredaspect.info/validation-is-for-loosers/</link>
	<description>Rob MacKay's Web Portfolio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 11:52:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob MacKay</title>
		<link>http://alteredaspect.info/validation-is-for-loosers/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob MacKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 12:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alteredaspect.info/?p=130#comment-213</guid>
		<description>He has a point though - I need to make time to keep my own site as ship shape as I can  - I don&#039;t get why people who make the plugin&#039;s can&#039;t generate code that validates though... very odd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He has a point though &#8211; I need to make time to keep my own site as ship shape as I can  &#8211; I don&#8217;t get why people who make the plugin&#8217;s can&#8217;t generate code that validates though&#8230; very odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silvers</title>
		<link>http://alteredaspect.info/validation-is-for-loosers/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>silvers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 12:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alteredaspect.info/?p=130#comment-212</guid>
		<description>yeah it&#039;s a good point. i do need to validate my sites more often. it must be very frustrating when you help people so much and they can&#039;t even help themselves. 

and it was also funny how you owned hmm for his bitchiness. i love it when a smart ass become a stupid dick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah it&#8217;s a good point. i do need to validate my sites more often. it must be very frustrating when you help people so much and they can&#8217;t even help themselves. </p>
<p>and it was also funny how you owned hmm for his bitchiness. i love it when a smart ass become a stupid dick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob MacKay</title>
		<link>http://alteredaspect.info/validation-is-for-loosers/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob MacKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alteredaspect.info/?p=130#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Dear annon poster. 

1) it was an emphasis on the sound &quot;oooo&quot;  As in Loooooooosers - maybe I should have added more.
2) Most are plugin/wordpress related - I don&#039;t want to waste time re-coding plugins. 
3) Unfortunately exceptions have to be made when you use Wordpress plugins, strict can break em. 

The point I was making is the validator isn&#039;t a god we have to worship - validation isn&#039;t something you have to aim for and some of the time is impossible to hit and still have a  sites working cross browser.  Validation however is an awesome tool for finding those bugs! 

How very brave of you to post under your true identity - I find your comments so wise and so enlightening...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear annon poster. </p>
<p>1) it was an emphasis on the sound &#8220;oooo&#8221;  As in Loooooooosers &#8211; maybe I should have added more.<br />
2) Most are plugin/wordpress related &#8211; I don&#8217;t want to waste time re-coding plugins.<br />
3) Unfortunately exceptions have to be made when you use Wordpress plugins, strict can break em. </p>
<p>The point I was making is the validator isn&#8217;t a god we have to worship &#8211; validation isn&#8217;t something you have to aim for and some of the time is impossible to hit and still have a  sites working cross browser.  Validation however is an awesome tool for finding those bugs! </p>
<p>How very brave of you to post under your true identity &#8211; I find your comments so wise and so enlightening&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmm</title>
		<link>http://alteredaspect.info/validation-is-for-loosers/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alteredaspect.info/?p=130#comment-203</guid>
		<description>1. Losers
2. Your page throws 20 validation errors
3. Your doctype is transitional</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Losers<br />
2. Your page throws 20 validation errors<br />
3. Your doctype is transitional</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
